Documents prove Daniels lease of Saint Edward State Park is illegal without replacement property of equal value.
Core documents prove Daniels lease of five to eight plus acres of Saint Edward State Park is illegal without replacement property:
1978 Deed from General Administration to State Parks, requiring if a different use is made of the land than what is in the Land and Water Conservation Project Agreement and successful Application, then according to Land and Water Conservation Grant Handbook, property of equal value must be exchanged for that use, and in the case of this Deed, marine property of equal value is stipulated, though there is confusion as to what is “marine” property.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1m2pKpgk2LyT58zjp_vJwXkWSQAD8Ub4Q/view?usp=sharing
Project Agreement for Land and Water Conservation Grant, between the State General Administration and the Federal Government which states that the use of the land will be exclusively passive recreation. This is considered a binding contract as is the successful application for the funds which stipulated passive recreation:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1snQJphwIoAdr5Atw6iTOeVZ8D7X230cd/view?usp=sharing
Handbook in effect when Land and Water Conservation Act Grant funded to purchase the land -- it contains the rules that govern the contract between the State and the Federal government.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pNUskR-9p6hIO8hQNVe0S50m8xUvVLD_/view?usp=sharing
drive.google.com
|
In the Handbook, for instance:
Page 109 states that development is okay for
lands acquired by Fund assistance IF IN ACCORD WITH THE PURPOSES; see project
agreement.
Page 117 cites the spirit of the Land and
Water Conservation Act regarding lodging: austere cabins, not luxury lodges,
luxury motels, or luxury cabins.
Page 77 states that historic sites
management activities are limited to preservation and building maintenance:
5. Developments Management should be limited to activities that
would effect such preservation and restoration as may be necessary to protect
the features from deterioration and to interpret their significance to the
public. Access to the area should be adequate but on-site development limited
to prevent overuse.
Pages 44 and 45
describe rules of Contingency Fund portion of Land and Water Conservation
Grant, how this land was acquired. Specific criteria are listed with the
requirement: Requests for assistance from the Contingency Reserve must meet the
same basic requirements as required for assistance from the State's regular
apportionment.
Page 24 on the “Project Agreement”: A contract executed between the United States and a State setting
forth the mutual obligations with regard to a portion or all of a specific
project.
Page 30 states that a Project Agreement may
be submitted later, in which case the application, (which was for passive
recreation), is deemed the Project Agreement. (.13b)
National Parks Service, the enforcement agency for the Secretary
of the Interior, citing 2014 policy for Land and
Water Conservation Act Grants, without
information that the development would be a convention complex and designed to
bring in a population totally different than park visitors there to enjoy a
park experience, as reason Daniels project does not require a “conversion”:
land of equal value: https://drive.google.com/file/d/12j1a6Rz2F46GeXd0xKs7RkCKNEqN8CVM/view?usp=sharing
2014
Memorandum, the 2014 policy that is referenced in above letter that gives more
leniency to concessionaires, but it does not go far enough to include Daniels’
plan for a whole new population of visitors not there for a park experience,
but for a convention experience: https://drive.google.com/file/d/12wcM2sio-6-0DywMfFqgAXVaTOfoQuIM/view?usp=sharing
Real Property Attorney assessment of Daniel’s possession of Saint
Edward State Park as illegal according to 2014 policy cited above: (It is already proven illegal according to the Project Agreement
referenced above.) https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cL2jntdM61vZWE8qPL19BljWRvSiJqLvD_9VoKBVuKY/edit?usp=sharing
The
executed and signed lease can be found at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UqmCblgTKbMX9wNP0b5fQw5OhgMVPLPp/view?usp=sharing In the signed lease Daniels is responsible for
causing a conversion.
An agreement approved by the State Parks Commissioners
January 9, 2017 can be found at: https://1drv.ms/b/s!AljizU2bpfv8r2kCxQp9jJqqmoaX The State Parks Director
can make “minor” changes to the lease without the approval of the State Parks
Commission; thus, the lease can go through revisions and further remove
itself from a legal lease. State Parks cannot
deny Daniels any “reasonable” request, which can like “minor” changes move the
lease even further from legality.
Revised
February 14, 2019 to add executed lease. AH
Comments
Post a Comment